My thoughts than went to the notion that a good rushing team might have good passing rate stats while a good passing team might have good rushing rate stats. In other words, high rushing totals begets high average yards per passing attempt, while high passing totals begets high average yards per rush. This is because a team that's good in one aspect of offense won't rack up big numbers in the other aspect but when they do use it, they might catch the opponents off-guard and have fair success.
I tried out my theory against team stats for 2007 and here's what I came up with:
Team | PassYds | RushAvg | RushYds | PassAvg |
Arizona Cardinals | 5 | 30 | 29 | 10 |
Atlanta Falcons | 18 | 20 | 26 | 21 |
Baltimore Ravens | 23 | 17 | 16 | 29 |
Buffalo Bills | 30 | 18 | 15 | 22 |
Carolina Panthers | 29 | 15 | 14 | 31 |
Chicago Bears | 15 | 32 | 30 | 23 |
Cincinnati Bengals | 7 | 28 | 24 | 7 |
Cleveland Browns | 12 | 6 | 10 | 12 |
Dallas Cowboys | 4 | 10 | 17 | 2 |
Denver Broncos | 13 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
Detroit Lions | 9 | 19 | 31 | 15 |
Green Bay Packers | 2 | 12 | 21 | 3 |
Houston Texans | 11 | 24 | 22 | 6 |
Indianapolis Colts | 6 | 22 | 18 | 4 |
Jacksonville Jaguars | 17 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Kansas City Chiefs | 20 | 31 | 32 | 27 |
Miami Dolphins | 24 | 16 | 23 | 30 |
Minnesota Vikings | 28 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
New England Patriots | 1 | 14 | 13 | 1 |
New Orleans Saints | 3 | 29 | 28 | 14 |
New York Giants | 21 | 4 | 4 | 26 |
New York Jets | 25 | 23 | 19 | 24 |
Oakland Raiders | 31 | 13 | 6 | 25 |
Philadelphia Eagles | 10 | 2 | 8 | 17 |
Pittsburgh Steelers | 22 | 7 | 3 | 9 |
San Diego Chargers | 26 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
San Francisco 49ers | 32 | 11 | 27 | 32 |
Seattle Seahawks | 8 | 26 | 20 | 13 |
St. Louis Rams | 19 | 25 | 25 | 28 |
Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 16 | 9 | 11 | 11 |
Tennessee Titans | 27 | 21 | 5 | 20 |
Washington Redskins | 14 | 27 | 12 | 16 |
This chart probably needs a little explanation. (Gee, ya think?) The categories, across the top, are team passing yards (discounting sacks), team yards per rush, team rushing yards, and team average yards per pass attempt. The numbers are each team's rank in that particular category.
The colors are meant to show the correlation between the two (potentially) like categories. For the total pass/rush avg. combo, red indicates the team was in the top half (1-16) in league rank for 2007. Orange signifies bottom half (17-32). For the total rush/pass avg. combo, green is top half, blue is bottom half. In theory, like colors should be next to each other in the chart: red-red and orange-orange in the left half and green-green/blue-blue in the right half.
At a glance, the matches seem iffy at best. Here's the breakdown:
Red-red: 7
Orange-orange: 7
Mix: 18
Green-Green: 7
Blue-Blue: 7
Mix: 18
Well, that's rather disappointing. All the trouble of a color-coded chart, and that's what I end up with? Maybe it's just that, for the teams that were best in rushing or passing, that success came because of the ineptness of the other side of the ball -- that certainly was the case with the Vikings -- and nothing was going to bring that part of the team "up to speed."
Still, it's worth noting that the concept that one part of the offense being very good will have a profound effect on the other is probably still overexaggerated. Of the top 12 rushing teams last year, only Philadelphia -- at #10 -- had a top-10 passing attack. Similarly, of the top 10 passing teams, it was Philly again that was the only team with a top-10 rushing game (#8), and they were only barely in the top 10. The New England Patriots, for all their offensive fireworks and big leads, only ranked #13 overall in rushing (and #14 in yards per carry).
So if you're thinking Tarvaris Jackson makes a great sleeper pick in fantasy football this year, don't hold your breath. If he does improvem it will be because of his continued maturity and experience and the addition of Bernard Berrian. It won't be because Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor are making it significantly easier to pass. And I'm sure as heck not drafting Laurence Maroney in the first round again this year...
1 comment:
The positive thing is that your analysis provides an argument for Vikings fans confronted with: "Taravaris Jackson sucks. Minnesota has the best running game in the league and he STILL couldn't find much success."
Awesome.
Post a Comment